Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NUST Journal of Engineering Sciences

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 01:07, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NUST Journal of Engineering Sciences[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent sources, not indexed in any selective major databases (GS aims to cover everything and is not selective). Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 08:20, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. czar · · 08:22, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. czar · · 08:22, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. czar · · 08:22, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Citations to (Gscholar) , and library holdings of (Worldcat), both unimpressive, almost no history. Can a journal have a case of NOTYET? Ray^Talk 14:26, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't see how a five-year-old academic journal with no mentions in mainstream or academic media even passes WP:GNG. MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:13, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Ray, if there isn't precedent, let's set it: Journal NOTYET. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 06:31, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Ray. – Joaquin008 ^(talk) 20:55, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.