Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NSI Holdings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cupid.com. Article does not appear notable enough as an independent article (non-admin closure) — Music1201 ^talk 18:30, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NSI Holdings[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company. Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. scope_creep (talk) 18:52, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:58, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:58, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:58, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to Cupid.com as non-notable. BEFORE checks show no non-trivial mentions in independent reliable sources. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 18:21, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Cupid.com. Holding companies absolutely can be notable if there is WP:CORPDEPTH, but I only found a few references and they are mainly listings or press releases. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.