Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NSF (file format)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:25, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NSF (file format)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable (due to lack of third-party sources), and has also been entirely unsourced since its creation in 2003. The article was also way too heavy on technical specification without explaining why it was important/needed to be stated (which I removed in some recent edits). I nominate this article to be redirected to chiptune, or any other article if somebody can think of a better one. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 20:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. -- ferret (talk) 20:58, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Being unsourced for thirteen years is a pretty strong indicator that GNG-meeting sources aren't coming. Between it being completely unsourced, and other Nintendo hardware-related articles being generally pretty well maintained, makes me think there wouldn't be any worth merging. Sergecross73 msg me 15:33, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.