Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mystera

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:07, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mystera[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has already been PRODded in 2011, with the dePROD rationale on the talk page being "As it is merely a list of tracks it is difficult to site anything other than the CD's themselves. The page is accurate and I have found it very useful", which I don't think is a good reason to keep an unsourced article. I was unable to find any sources other than one review for 'The Best Of Mystera' from MusikWoche here. Fails notability guidelines. Waxworker (talk) 13:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Waxworker (talk) 13:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and protect to avoid being recreated. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nominator. Also, what did Mystera have to do with classical music? —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 01:40, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Salt: - does not meet WP:NMUSIC --Whiteguru (talk) 11:17, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.