Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Show

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Doug Bell ^talk 15:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My Show[edit]

The article describes a low-budget show featuring an aspiring talk show host named Matt Chin. An example is available here: [1] My view is that the show or the host could eventually achieve sufficient popularity to be included in Wikipedia, but that at the moment there is little to distinguish it from many other programs on Youtube and elsewhere. Arsene 3:49, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Weak Keep - Clearly this does exist but I think deletion would be a little harsh. It appears to be an actual TV show and the page does cite its sources and references. I see no reason for this pages deletion but the page itself needs a little bit of cleaning up... Debaser23 12:03, 7 December 2006 (UTC)--C.lettinga 06:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Is on the internet, but also Category 2 cable TV in canada. May not be the most notable show, but is available on cable so I think it should get a chance. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 12:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I don't want to be overly stubborn about this, but does its appearance on Bite TV really offer an argument for its inclusion here? From what I can see the channel isn't particularly selective about its content, maybe more so than a public-access station but not a great deal more. It seems like a public access program (unless it were an especially noteworthy case) would be deemed insignificant for Wikipedia, and so what I want to ask is whether this program really has enough at this point to distinguish it from the former case. Arsene 4:44, 8 December 2006
Delete. It's short on reliable sources and full of original research. Youtube is not a reliable source for anything (moreover, these are primary sources, there aren't any secondary sources). ColourBurst 19:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, —Doug Bell ^talk 00:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per ColourBurst. Danny Lilithborne 00:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Abstain. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hotentot (talk • contribs) 00:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per ColourBurst. --Sable232 01:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per ColourBurst. Even though it's also on cable, there are literally thousands of ephemeral cable-based shows, and there is no assertion of notability for this one. --Dhartung | Talk 02:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per ColourBurst. Existence ≠ Notability. Chovain 03:28, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Colourburst. Good point, I completely agree. --K yo cat^{¿Quíeres hablar?} 04:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per ColourBurst. TSO1D 04:40, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. MER-C 04:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and ColorBurst.--John Lake 05:27, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above--C.lettinga 06:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom & Colourburst. SkierRMH,06:44, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no reliable, third party sources, as far as I can see. WilyD 14:09, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. A Train ^{take the} 15:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.