Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Name Is Skrillex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Modussiccandi (talk) 13:43, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My Name Is Skrillex[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NALBUM. Was able to locate a review by Billboard but that's about it. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Billboard is a pretty high level, mainstream source - they don't usually cover little niche stuff. It kind of seems unlikely to me that they would be the only ones to ever do a deep-dive retrospective like that. Just a thought - I haven't done any digging yet, I was just surprised to see this nom. Sergecross73 msg me 15:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I was able to locate some more coverage by Your EDM but unfortunately it seems to be rather shallow and brief. Also unsure if this source would qualify as a reliable publication. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  Yeah, similarly, I found another feature at EDM.com, but I'm not familiar with that website either. (I don't follow the genre much.) If it is a reliable source, it does make the claim of it being one of the most important EDM releases of all time, which would be significant. Sergecross73 msg me 22:09, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep AtomicMario ^{(Talk to me | My contributions)} 21:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The YourEDM.com and EDM.com articles here and mentioned above ([1][2],this EDM.com article) appear reputable per WP:A/S because they were written by editorial staff. Taken together with the Billboard article, this meets WP:NALBUM Heartmusic678 (talk) 13:46, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:NALBUM with sources presented by Heartmusic. They're reliable enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 00:30, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.