Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic (season 4)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. While I don't think an article is needed yet (half of the article is generic plot sentences, with the development section being the only thing that's really exclusive to the article) it seems the consensus is that, while there isn't a lot of information, there's enough. Beerest355 Talk 13:47, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic (season 4)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Unlike other upcoming television seasons (Family Guy (season 12), for instance), there's no confirmed dates or episodes yet. Beerest355 Talk 17:38, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Beerest355 Talk 17:39, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Beerest355 Talk 17:39, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- Personally I wouldn't have created this myself with as little as we have to go on now, but we do have valid sourcing that these season exists, just that it won't air for another 6-some months. It would be pointless to delete something affirmed to be happening. --MASEM (t) 17:54, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There has been ample coverage about the new season, they turning the ponies into teenage girls. Dream Focus 18:01, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- (That's the movie (My Little Pony: Equestria Girls), but needless to say, they've talked about S4 in relation to the movie as well.) --MASEM (t) 18:12, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Masem: enough RSs exist, even if the dates or episode names aren't released yet. Jclemens (talk) 18:50, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, there's enough reliable sources to justify an article. It's got coverage and will continue to do so until the release. Everyone, get your snowsuits out! --Yellow1996 (talk) 20:40, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In my opinion the only basis for opining delete is a strong IDONTLIKEIT for those brony weirdos. Which is quite rational, but not what we are supposed to be doing here. Passes GNG from sources showing. Carrite (talk) 02:23, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Please assume good faith. I don't think Beerest was attacking the show or its fans, just that, yes, we do generally require assurance that a season is going to air before we create the article on it. Just that in this case, we do actually have that assurance compared to what is claimed --MASEM (t) 03:01, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.