Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyHeritage
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep Non-Admin closure. Tiddly-Tom 07:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
MyHeritage[edit]
Non-notable website whose speedy deletion was declined. Mh29255 (talk) 15:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - significant coverage in reliable sources Addhoc (talk) 15:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep the news articles in the San Francisco Chronicle, Washington Post and CBS News show notability. Gwernol 15:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Notable Bilky asko (talk) 21:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep multiple references from reliable sources = notable. Certainly not a speedy candidate. --Canley (talk) 23:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 19:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: the speedy close of this deletion debate (bundled with Chris Redfield), was reviewed and found to be improper. It is being relisted as a result. JERRY talk contribs 19:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment by original closer added by User:Jerry
The result was keep(non-admin closure) ChetblongTalkSign 12:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply] - Keep out-of-process close or not, this does have enough sources to establish notability. — brighterorange (talk) 20:08, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep notable —dima/talk/ 03:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As noted by user:Addhoc, this article deals with a subject that is referenced in over 100 news articles --GenUser (talk) 15:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: WikiProject Companies has been informed of this ongoing discussion. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 17:32, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.