Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mustard (software)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  JGHowes  talk 01:42, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mustard (software)[edit]

Mustard (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. The article hasn't been significantly edited since 2011. The link to the website is dead. Searches for "mustard microblogging" turn up a couple of brief reviews [1] [2] and a mention as one of 41 open-source projects examined in an academic paper [3], but not much else. The only incoming link from article space is the disambiguation page Mustard. —Bkell (talk) 22:44, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 07:52, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. While I love open-source posting software, this does not seem to be very notable, and the website being defunct makes it virtually impossible for it to ever become notable. It doesn't seem to have been covered at the time, and why would be covered in the future? jp×g 11:40, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: An apparently defunct project, which attracted some passing coverage and mentions around launch, but I am not seeing evidence that the product attained notability. AllyD (talk) 15:20, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Dead software, non-notable. Oaktree b (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, Per nom. , no sign of notability. Alex-h (talk) 11:12, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, doesn't pass WP:GNG Spudlace (talk) 06:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.