Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mustafa Shaikh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Maharashtra cricketers. Daniel (talk) 13:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mustafa Shaikh[edit]

Mustafa Shaikh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 16:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:36, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:36, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:36, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - WP:GNG is irrelevant here, as he passes WP:CRIN by virtue of having played in a first class match. DevaCat1 (talk) 16:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to List of Maharashtra cricketers or similar Has played 1 FC game, but no coverage. Using similar precedent to that used by WP:FOOTY when a player has 1 or a few matches but no coverage, they are deleted/redirected. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails WP:GNG, the single first-class appearance doesn't seem to be covered by any substantial source. --Ashleyyoursmile! 18:16, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.