Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mustafa Majid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 04:54, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mustafa Majid[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a fringe theorist of ethnic groups in Bangladesh who fails WP:NAUTHOR. Worldcat says his most widely held book is in 20 libraries ([1]). Most of the cites in this article are dead or unhelpful, but there is one review in The Daily Star in English [2], so at least the beginnings of a WP:NAUTHOR case. Articles in other Wikipedias do not help with sourcing. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 01:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 01:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 01:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 01:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fringe theorist lacking the broad coverage we require for such figures.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - zero evidence of notability Spiderone 22:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.