Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musk electric jet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lourdes 15:00, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Musk electric jet[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a vague concept that Musk has discussed nothing more, there is nothing significant distinguishing this from any other hypothetical electric jet concept other than "Elon Musk is involved". Consider recreating such an article when one of Musk's companies has actually produced at least a prototype of such a jet. Concepts like this are barely (if even) notable. Sarr Cat 14:31, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:TOOSOON and WP:CRYSTAL apply. Kirbanzo (talk) 16:21, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into electric aircraft per WP:PRESERVE. It would be sensible to collate all the various ideas and proposals there so that readers can compare and contrast them. Andrew D. (talk)

Even so, there is no concrete information about the proposal in the article. There is also the issue that it isn't notable as it's only claim of notability is relation to a famous person (in this case, Elon Musk). Kirbanzo (talk) 16:51, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Elon Musk. He's the reason why this is worth talking about anyway, so let's merge it there - a couple of sentences saying this is something he's talked about should suffice. FOARP (talk) 18:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt – The best hint we have is Musk saying "I’m quite tempted to do something about it." Not every WP:FART is notable. No factual contents to preserve in a merge. Salt title to prevent fans from re-creating a stub based on speculation du jour. — JFG ^talk 19:07, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt if this doesn’t go away. It’s vaporware, an extraordinary claim, and when your best sources have words like “NO PLANS FOR...” and “CRAZY IDEAS FOR THE FUTURE” in the headlines, that’s a giant blinking neon red flag saying no. Just no. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:34, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:42, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:44, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom. - ZLEA _Talk\^Contribs 22:45, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.