Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musical Freedom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:53, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Musical Freedom[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity label of the DJ Tiesto, sources do not indicate any notability. Lists a number of singles and remixes that fail the criteria under WP:MUSIC. Redirect to Spinnin' Records. Karst (talk) 21:56, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - notable label that can use expansion. There are significant coverage of reliable sources on Google. - TheMagnificentist 06:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above, it's a notable label that can use expansion. There are significant coverage of reliable sources on Google. 141.138.146.132 (talk) 10:06, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm staying out of this a little bit since I got involved with the creator's unblock request, but I just want to point out that the above users provide no proof of notability. Drmies (talk) 04:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - this is not a vanity label. Just because an artist starts a record label that does not make it a vanity label. By that definition Capitol Records is a vanity label of Johnny Mercer. A vanity label is a label completely controlled by a parent label but given a specific branding in order to please a particular artist. These in general should be merged into the parent label. A second type of vanity label is one that is for self-releases by an artist, these in general should be merged into the artist. I don't see that any such merge would be of benefit, so this is either a notable record label, or its not. The significant number of notable artists indicate a high probability that this is a notable record label, although the short history of operation indicates the opposite. Perhaps someone more familiar with this genre can find some solid sources? 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Antepenultimate (talk) 15:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Antepenultimate (talk) 15:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Antepenultimate (talk) 15:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:59, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.