Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music from The Get Down

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASRJuliancolton | Talk 01:56, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Music from The Get Down[edit]

Music from The Get Down (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure why the prod was declined, since the rationale still applies: No evidence of notability. The soundtrack of the show may be notable (and it has it's own article), but this list of various music on the show is still uncited (all the cites deal with the soundtrack, not the subject of this article, which is much broader). The lack of citations also makes this pretty much OR. Regardless, while the soundtrack may be notable, this article isn't. Onel5969 TT me 12:39, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:21, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) 00:18, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added citations and organized the page in a way that is more useful to Wikipedia readers. So, for me, the article should be kept and expanded.--TheVampire (talk) 22:54, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, and I am sorry for moving the page. When I realized it should not have been done, it was already done. But the redirect still points to the page, so I hope it won't be a big problem.--TheVampire (talk) 23:03, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.