Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music Is Revolution Foundation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 21:22, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Music Is Revolution Foundation[edit]
- Music Is Revolution Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable sources given or found to establish notability of an organization.
Prod was removed because cites were added. Three are from the company (doesn't exactly prove notability) and one was from a student paper, effectively a gig listing.
The best claim to fame is having semi-notable people involved. tedder (talk) 06:41, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- tedder (talk) 06:41, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- tedder (talk) 06:42, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- tedder (talk) 06:43, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and per wp:crystal. Not currently notable and notability from the bassist is not inherited 7 06:47, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability isn't inherited. There's no indication the foundation itself is notable. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 06:47, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete I found one press citation [1] that may provide significant coverage about the foundation; that's probably not enough to establish notability. Sounds like a worthwhile foundation and kudos to the people who are doing it, but it doesn't seem to meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability. --MelanieN (talk) 15:45, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.