Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music Gets Me High

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:36, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Music Gets Me High[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Source assessment table:
1	Self-published.	~ It depends, basic info, yes; claims of notability, no.	By virtue of being self-published.	✘ No
2	? 404	? 404	? 404	? Unknown
3	? The extensive quotes, promotional language and inclusion of contact details make me think this could be sponsored content.	? Unfamiliar with the publication and considering the aforementioned possibility sponsored content, I'll leave this as unknown.	Covers the company.	? Unknown
4	? 404	? 404	? 404	? Unknown
5	? Appears to be a press-release.	Minor publication.	Mentions the company in passing twice, primarily covers its founder.	✘ No
6	No apparent affiliation.	? Unfamiliar with publication.	Mentions the company's founder in the list, about her, not the company.	✘ No
7	No apparent affiliation.	? Unfamiliar with publication.	Does not mention the company, only Nayan.	✘ No
8	? 404	? 404	? 404	? Unknown
9	No apparent affiliation.	? Unfamiliar with publication.	Quotes Nayan, mentions the company in passing.	✘ No
10	Written by Nayan.	? Unfamiliar with publication.	By virtue of being affiliated.	✘ No
11	? 404	? 404	? 404	? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

From this source assessment, it appears the requisite depth of independent, reliable coverage for corporations has not been satisfied to establish corporate notability. SITH (talk) 20:03, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:05, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:06, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:06, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per all of the above.TH1980 (talk) 03:13, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom . Unoc (talk) 13:07, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.