Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MusiCAD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Shouldn't have relisted a third time, my apologies (non-admin closure) Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 08:46, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MusiCAD[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just generally WP:GNG/WP:PROD, I can't seem find any sources on it that are secondary, and there's only the website, by the looks of it. AtlasDuane (talk) 11:34, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:53, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:53, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article has existed since 2004 with no citations and with seemingly no news coverage that details the program. Userqio (talk) 00:49, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Among others, added citation from a review (in Dutch) from 1994 in a no longer active Dutch magazine 'Akkoord'. Arent (talk) 19:08, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:13, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Score writers, apart from the 2 big ones, don't get any attention in the main stream press or in music reference works. However, if Wikipedia wants to be an encyclopedia, the 1st of its WP:five pillars, and cover this area of software, the page for this program ought to be kept. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 00:25, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Scott (talk) 02:46, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - one source and fails WP:NSOFT RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 21:09, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 09:00, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.