Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muse Art Gallery (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 03:27, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Muse Art Gallery[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. No WP:RS Of the refs that aren't deadlinks, none rise above a press release. Also, WP:COI. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaali Sudheer (2nd nomination) Theredproject (talk) 16:57, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:51, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:51, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:51, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Also, with all due regrets, Hyderabad is not an internatiomal-level art scene. Bearian (talk) 01:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:05, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP This article doesn't really I have reliable sources though it does passes some WP:GNG I mean to say in some territories this library isn't International but is it only International libraries have the place on Wikipedia? then we need to submit half of the libraries to WP:AFD MrZINE | talk 21:33, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Confirmed sockpuppet account. – The Grid (talk) 21:27, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not satisfy the notability guidelines. The refernces are all dead links, press release, or unmistakable advertising. Breaking sticks (talk) 23:31, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 00:26, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 00:38, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 00:38, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete could not find adequate RS to establish notability.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 08:19, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete References fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:28, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.