Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MuscleTech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JGHowes ^talk 02:36, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MuscleTech[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage. The articles two sources are passing mentions, and WP:BEFORE didn't turn up anything. Company doesn't have an article, so not suitable for merging Vahurzpu (talk) 17:23, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Vahurzpu (talk) 17:23, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 20:37, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 20:37, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 20:37, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Related discussions: 2007-03 Designer Whey Protein delete

Keep. New York Times wrote articles on the effectiveness of studies about MuscleTech's products [1] and how a bodybuilder lost his contract with MuscleTech after admitting to using steroids in Bigger, Stronger, Faster [2]. Two journal articles discuss a lawsuit between a distribution company and MuscleTech [3] [4] and the National Post writes on the scrutiny these lawsuits have in Canada [5] and the inner workings of the company before it was sold to Iovate [6]. I think this amount of coverage allows this to pass WP:GNG. Z1720 (talk) 01:29, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep due to the points raised by Z1720 and the extra coverage on [7] [8] [9] Mathias (talk) 06:54, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep agree per above comments. VocalIndia (talk) 05:43, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.