Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musō Shinden Eishin-ryū

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 00:01, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Musō Shinden Eishin-ryū[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has a lot of issues, but the main probles are that it doesn't seem to have significant independent coverage and doesn't show notability--so it fails both WP:GNG and WP:MANOTE. Jakejr (talk) 23:48, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly merge into Iaido - I do see a lot of Google hits for the Japanese spelling 無雙神傳英信流抜刀兵法, but it's hard to tell which of them might be considered a reliable source. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:14, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not Iaido this art is a Koryu.Peter Rehse (talk) 18:46, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see notability or signficant coverage for this style. If kept, the article needs to be pared down (such as removing the list of kata).Mdtemp (talk) 16:40, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As with Oishi Shinkage-ryū those lists need to be cleaned up.Peter Rehse (talk) 14:06, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete My search didn't find support for notability claims and the article's sources are of questionable independence and reliability. That is, I found nothing to show they meet WP:RS or WP:V. I'm open to change if more sources or info are provided. Papaursa (talk) 04:20, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.