Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murky buartoonirsimmon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was *Bang* (aka Delete) (delivering the coup de grace to this unfortunate mutant). P.S. WP:CSD provides information on speedy deletion options and methodology. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 04:54, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Murky buartoonirsimmon

Murky buartoonirsimmon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Completion of incomplete nomination. For my part, Neutral until I look at the evidence. Blanchardb-^{MeMyEarsMyMouth}-timed 17:26, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. 9 non-Wikipedia ghits, all of which are either empty or nonsensical dicdefs. --Blanchardb-^{MeMyEarsMyMouth}-timed 17:45, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I'm honestly starting to wonder whether this page was just done as a prank? It can't seriously be considered a true attempt at an article. I'm a native English speaker, and I have no clue what it's trying to say -- it contains a bunch of made-up words and phrases, the grammar makes no sense, etc.; on top of that, there are no external links or references cited. And back to the glaring main issue -- what is the article even about? A fruit? A character from a comic book's fictional universe? I have no clue. This needs to be deleted. Pierce Phillips (talk) 11:58, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

What are these sentences even supposed to mean?: "... when saved over a long period of time, dryness becomes harder and harder like a dried persimmon gradually at the progress time." & "It is reported that it is the beginning of persimmon cultivation of Isazawa that Emon VII of Isazawa during Treasure Calendar era took a persimmon-of-wasp (蜂屋柿, hachiyagaki?) in Isazawa from nowhere." Seriously, what is this garbage?! Pierce Phillips (talk) 12:00, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete next time, use the CSD RogueNinja_talk 09:39, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Well, I would have if I had had any clue how. Putting an article up for deletion is one of the many things for which the Wiki software does not provide a simple, fast, easy, user-friendly, GUI option. Pierce Phillips (talk) 12:48, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. This is patent nonsense and could have been speedied. --Lockley (talk) 06:44, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Well, I would have if I had had any clue how. Putting an article up for deletion is one of the many things for which the Wiki software does not provide a simple, fast, easy, user-friendly, GUI option. Pierce Phillips (talk) 12:48, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment. Pierce Phillips, there was no implied criticism of you there. I agree, the deletion process could use some improvement and clarity. (smile) --Lockley (talk) 16:11, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete because it is pure nonsense. --Orlady (talk) 04:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.