Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Clair Tiltman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 04:26, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Murder of Clair Tiltman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tragic but nothing not notable murder/crime. ...William 16:18, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree The case is prominent in the UK and involves someone who is a serial attacker and parents who are prominent in local politics and covered-up for the murderer. Also her friends who campaigned for many years to keep the case in the public eye. Please also get the poor girls name correct - it is "Claire". David J Johnson (talk) 11:13, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.

Keep - seem to cover GNG and CRIME.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:54, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - case has had extensive media coverage over a long period of time. The potential for further charges relating to the alleged cover-up also mean this already notable case may become even more so. The fact that the murder victim was a child tends to also increase notability.Shakehandsman (talk) 02:05, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - notable murder with long-term coverage in the mainstream media. Jim Michael (talk) 21:27, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Shakehandsman and Jim Michael. We have tended to keep articles involving well-known deaths that have ongoing significant coverage in reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 20:43, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, sources indicate notability. Everyking (talk) 03:59, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.