Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mumtaz Ali Kazi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist 03:13, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mumtaz Ali Kazi[edit]

Mumtaz Ali Kazi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:GNG. I could not locate reliable sources to support the information written in the article. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 05:31, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Since his career is basicly pre-internet it will be much harder to find. However I did find a reference quite easily, the claims are significant, so this person will easily pass WP:PROF, and you could be sure there will be more references in newspapers and other publications. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:05, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment> Keep. Certainly does not pass WP:Prof#C1 on basis of GS research citations. May pass WP:Politician or WP:Prof#C3 . Xxanthippe (talk) 01:40, 29 January 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:48, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:48, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: "President of Pakistan Academy of Sciences for two terms during 1978-84 and 1985-88" definitely suggests notability. There's an obit published in Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences. It cannot be fully viewed, but its presence in the publications confirms his role in the academy, and the overall significance of Kazi's career. I adjusted the lead to make notability clearer. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:59, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as the Academy position is enough. SwisterTwister talk 02:12, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: academy position is strongly indicative of notability. Double sharp (talk) 05:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, I agree that his position as president of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences establishes notability. Smmurphy(Talk) 21:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above Presidency of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences makes him notable. --Uhooep (talk) 18:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.