Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multi-Edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 18:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Multi-Edit[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Coverage is mostly from blogs and download websites, with user-contributed content. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 10:09, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – As historically significant. In the MS-DOS era it was one of the two most popular programmer's editors for DOS, along with Brief. And it survived as one of four or five up to around Windows 95 era. I've added a History section to the article with some magazine cites from that time, including a 1995 review of programmers' editors from PC Mag, which gives an overview of what was popular then. – Margin1522 (talk) 15:33, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
keep-Per above. Wgolf (talk) 19:04, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:48, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:48, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This was pretty popular back in the day, and there are still a few archived reviews on Google Books. There's also this review from Dr. Dobbs. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:45, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:33, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Squeaks by WP:GNG. Source examples: [1], [2], [3], [4]. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.