Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mullen Lowe Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:37, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mullen Lowe Group[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ironically, this article on an advertising agency seems largely to have been written by an advertising agency. All the sources are churnalism apart from the ones that aren't even that, they are the original press releases. Guy (Help!) 22:56, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:52, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:52, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It's worth mentioning this has existed since APril 2005 when Heyz started it but I found nothing else to suggest better improvement aside from this and this. Notifying past users Hamiltonstone and Ukexpat. SwisterTwister talk 03:56, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, leaning delete. This article has a host of problems, including COI authorship. I had thought that, ins spite of that, it may be a notable subject. But when I checked four of the references cited in the current version, one was a dead link, and none of the others actually mention "Mullen Lowe Group". They make reference to various related / parent / whatever firms, but not Mullen Group at all - it raises the question of whether this is even accurate, let alone notable. Probably we should delete and if someone can build from scratch properly, let them do that. hamiltonstone (talk) 05:39, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.