Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mukul Choksi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:47, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mukul Choksi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable consultant psychiatrist lacking non-trivial support. Article written by article subject. reddogsix (talk) 02:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:03, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - coverage isn't significant enough to pass WP:BIO. --Drm310 (talk) 01:34, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:49, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:49, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:49, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as although I found some results with News, Books and highbeam, there's nothing to suggest better improvement but feel free to draft and userfy. SwisterTwister talk 06:42, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Doesn't have enough in-depth coverage to pass either WP:GNG or WP:BIO, and the trivial mentions don't rise to the level of passing WP:BASIC. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.