Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mujtaba Haider Zaidi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:16, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mujtaba Haider Zaidi[edit]
- Mujtaba Haider Zaidi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sources are all self-generated. Web search for author and "published" book finds only promotional/user-generated pages and this article. The Lahore High Court's list of judges (http://lhc.gov.pk/?page_id=45) does not include Mr. Zaidi. Ejegg (talk) 20:33, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Notability not evident. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:19, 9 September 2013 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete. Notability is not inherited from famous family. A poet without a famous poem is not notable. Same with a playwright without a famous play. Research writing is usually not notable because it is away from the limelight, and this case is not an exception. Being a journalist is not notable by itself. Binksternet (talk) 03:25, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Many entries on sites with user-submitted content, but no WP:RS evidence of attained notability in any of the fields listed in the article. (The subject's claim on one of the user-submitted-content sites to be " author of over 900 Ph. D dissertations" does indicate a certain industriousness though.) AllyD (talk) 06:24, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete : A poet which is not known. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Virgininfatuation (talk • contribs) 22:01, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.