Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mujjo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mujjo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established; only non-affiliated sources are two blogs. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 16:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:46, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A Highbeam search turns up a few newspaper mentions (Irish Times, New Straits Times, Daily Mirror). However these are passing mentions of the products, in lists of novelty gift ideas, and fall short of the coverage of the firm that would be needed to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 07:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete coverage not sufficient to establish notability --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 12:30, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.