Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mujawamariya Hyacinthe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 10:27, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mujawamariya Hyacinthe[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Violation of BLP/GNG; unreliable sources. Attempts to find more information have yielded nothing. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:48, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hello AirshipJungleman29,

I'm glad to see your message. I just don't understand well the problem you have with this article, because what I wrote is true and has reliable sources, this person is still there, so you may help me to clarify the problem you had. thank you. LandFull (talk) 11:25, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Rwanda. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:54, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep How are the sources unreliable? They appear to be genuine Rwandan news outlets, several of which say she is an actress well-known for her role in Haranira kubaho. Needs more specifics, I also don't understand the rationale here. --Canley (talk) 12:54, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No significant coverage, a few mentions in local media does not amount to WP:SIGCOV. W C M_email 07:47, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:52, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no sources found, the ones given are mentions in passing. She exists, but not much found that can be used here. Oaktree b (talk) 22:48, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:31, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Non-notable. This should not have gone on this long. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 22:58, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.