Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Legenhausen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Flowerparty■ 04:23, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Muhammad Legenhausen[edit]
IS he that famous? I was going to speedy it, but decided not to. KILO-LIMA 16:28, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment — do his publications put him above the bar on the average professor test? It doesn't look like it, but I can't be sure. I'll take a pass. — RJH 18:18, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep don't think the average professor test is the best yardstick here and I certainly don't think it's a speedy. Maybe marginal, but he has some books , quite a few articles and an unusual history - an opportunity to act against systemic bias. Dlyons493 Talk 23:39, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
Deathphoenix ʕ 18:25, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Deathphoenix ʕ 18:25, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, appears to pass notability standard as published author by significant margin. Monicasdude 20:06, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- keep notable. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 21:44, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.