Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Kulmakhanov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Enochlau 05:25, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Kulmakhanov[edit]

Zero Google hits, appears to be either a completely non-notable politician or a hoax Delete abakharev 05:23, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. seems like a perfectly reasonable article. (Notorious4life 06:15, 28 November 2005 (UTC))[reply]
Keep. Fantasy, hoax, whatever. I believe every word of it. keep the pictures too. •DanMS 06:37, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
See also the nonsense article below: Kazakh Societist Party. Same topic, same author Pinkspikes. •DanMS 06:56, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete article and pictures unless reliable sources establishing notability (not just accuracy!) are provided. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 08:11, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Reliable article; not a prank. --Clay Collier 11:44, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Dlyons493 13:19, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't write it, I only cleaned up the pages. Pinkspikes 23:56, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

To the contrary, Pinkspikes. Read the history. You were the initial creator. •DanMS 04:45, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article is in serious need of references. If they cannot be provided by the time voting and discussion closes, delete. 147.70.242.21 01:32, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dont delete, Muhammad is a good guy and just wants the world to know about him. He is strong as well as his wife. They are both strong and just want to be known. You people think you will achieve something by deleting there legacy and way of speaking to the world. That ladies and gentelmen is wrong (anonymous comment by 24.1.75.37, 06:02, 29 November 2005 (UTC))[reply]

User 24.1.75.37, who made the unsigned comment above, was one of two contributors to this article and also was the author of Kazakh Societist Party, a related article which also up for AFD. This user is almost certainly Pinkspikes himself. Can an admin verify this? •DanMS 16:01, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
References definitely needed if that's the case. Frankly, I am skeptical of the legitimacy of the article, but Pinkspikes/24.1.75.37/etc. should take advantage of the lull and document every assertion along the way. If such documentation cannot be provided, speedy delete as a hoax. B.Wind 06:28, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.