The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Kirill Lokshin 05:04, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Not very notable, 145 Google hits Modular.(Talk.) 14:21, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I saw the website (you beat me to nominating). Research organizations usually have a lot of people doing that work. Unless someone can tell why specifically he is worthy of an article, I'd have to say delete. - Mgm|(talk) 14:23, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agreed: No assertion of notability. BrianSmithson 14:36, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
