Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mubarak al-Kabir Tower

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 20:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mubarak al-Kabir Tower[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article for a building that has not yet been built does not meet WP:NBUILDING nor WP:GNG criteria for notability. It is planned to be finished in 25 years, so it also seems to be a case of WP:CRYSTALBALL or WP:TOOSOON. Netherzone (talk) 20:11, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 20:11, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kuwait-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 20:11, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in agreement with the nomination: WP:CRYSTAL is relevant to almost all the content. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 20:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTALBALL building projects fall apart all the time and there's no guarantee this will be built. Ground hasn't even been broken on it yet. Having said that, and lord I hate to say it, but 2030 is only 9 years away. :O snood1205^{(Say Hi! (talk))} 20:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTALBALL HelpfulPi (talk) 21:16, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NBUILDING . LibStar (talk) 00:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It fails WP:NBUILDING, I can't find enough WP:SIGCOV to establish WP:GNG. Even if it were to meet WP:GNG or some WP:SNG, it fails the second part of WP:N, which is to say that it falls under what Wikipedia is not, owing to a fairly obvious violation of WP:CRYSTALBALL. Alternatives to deletion, like draftification, would do little to solve the WP:CRYSTALBALL problems. As a result, I am inclined towards deletion in this case. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 03:06, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.