Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Backup Z64

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:37, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Backup Z64[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N, though it isn't an area I have a lot of knowledge in. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, and I couldn't find a good WP:ATD. Boleyn (talk) 10:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable obscure unlicensed N64 hardware. Some of the other unlicensed hardware pages like the CD64 or the DexDrive are also obvious deletion candidates as well. There's not really a merge candidate for these things other than Homebrew_(video_games)#Nintendo_64 which is more in terms of software. But then, other than say, the GameShark I'm just not sure anything about random unlicensed hardware really merits encyclopedic status unless it clearly received significant coverage. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 11:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not really much to go on about here. There really aren't that many sources discussing about this hardware (per above), and the reliable sources engine only pulls up this. TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 04:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.