Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Movement to End Woman's Suffage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted as work of banned user. It was a hoax as wellCapitalistroadster 04:19, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Movement to End Woman's Suffage[edit]

Unverified and likely false. Judging from Google searches [1] [2], this group doesn't seem to actually exist. –Sommers ^(Talk) 01:21, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep definitely exists, it was active during the 2005 Cronulla race riots. I dont think they have a website, but thats not a prerequisite for having a Wikipedia article, last time I checked. Mary K. Sponze 01:28, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It isn't, but failing the Google test is a strong indicator that the subject is either non-notable or nonexistent. Otherwise it would have been mentioned somewhere on the Internet. And some verifiable source is needed, website or no. –Sommers ^(Talk) 01:33, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per Wikipedia:Search engine test. Royboy crashfan 01:35, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is verifiable, and real. For great justice. 01:40, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then prove it. Thatcher131 02:02, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a lot of things are real, but they may not necessarily be notable. --Khoikhoi 01:59, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I strongly suspect this is either a group of kids who made up a sign and joined the riots as a joke, if its not a complete hoax. Lexis/Nexis finds no hits on the word "suffrage" in connection with Sydney, much less "movement to end women's suffrage." And did any one else notice the title is spelled wrong? Thatcher131 02:02, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Smells like a hoax, and there's not enough to convince me that it's not. Brian G. Crawford 02:16, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax. Come on. Amcfreely 02:31, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this has gotta be a joke. There was a humorous attempt to "End the Suffrage of Women" on Comedy Central a few years back, which got a lot of signatures, demonstrating just how gullible people are... Grandmasterka 02:45, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Really misspelled, too. Grandmasterka 02:47, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Shows you how incompetent the anti-feminist, white-power movement is. Ignorance is not a rationale for deletion. Muhammad said that. Mary K. Sponze 03:03, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - Wow, less than three hours from first edit to being blocked indefinitely. That's something. Grand master ka 03:53, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete nonsense. I live in Australia and have never heard of this. The author, Mary K. Sponze has been indefinitely blocked for a troll account.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:35, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as patent nonsense. --TML1988 03:36, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax based on a bit from The Man Show. dbtfz ^talk 03:42, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as vandalism ˉˉ^anetode╞┬╡ 03:47, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as hoax, based on this edit by author. --Calair 04:02, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as hoax created by now-indefinitely blocked troll. joturn e r 04:07, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.