Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moveboxer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:13, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moveboxer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company looks like it never really too off, and now seems to be defunct. Fails WP:NCORP and WP:SUSTAINED. Edwardx (talk) 17:36, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:18, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:18, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: From its outset and AfC acceptance, most of the article content and references have related to the predecessor Lockboxer rather than to this venture. The SassyCEO reference is a short item which falls far short of adequate for WP:CORPDEPTH. There was also a 2014 Daily Herald item ([1] – via HighBeam (subscription required) ) which claims they had 2,500 clients over a 2 year period. At some point subsequently, Moveboxer seems to have disappeared into a redirect to Salesboxer but I am seeing no WP:RS coverage of that. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 19:00, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there is not enough dedicated content about the subject to meet WP:GNG.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.