Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Move with You

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar ⨹ 17:19, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move with You[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Literally nothing here to suggest notability at all. MaranoFan (talk) 16:40, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Doesn't meet WP:NSONG in any regard. It is not "the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label." and just as importantly it doesn't meet the criteria that "a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article." There's simply no indication on the Wikipedia page or elsewhere that there's enough of significance about this song to fill an article. DiscantX (talk) 00:47, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I was going to suggest redirecting to Jacob Banks (singer)#Singles. However, there's a hatnote on the page that links to Pork Tornado (album). The article name is vague, and might be better as a disambiguation page. I'm not quite sure which one would be better in this case. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:54, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:00, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Cannot establish that the subject meets GNG or NSONG. I don't believe a dab page is called for as there would be zero extant articles on songs by that name after deletion. As there is not a primary topic, a simple deletion is probably the correct move here. Deadbeef 01:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.