Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain Sheep

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:13, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mountain Sheep[edit]

Mountain Sheep (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hardly notable, found exactly one source (now in the article) that goes further than just mentioning the company, and even that one is pretty shallow. Fails all notability guidelines, general and project-specific. Edit: I expanded the article by anotehr source, though that one was written by the company's own COO so does not add to indepndency of sources. Still aiming for deletion. Lordtobi () 16:13, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:03, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:03, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:03, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not enough for an article. I see Argali as a potential redirect target afterwords since Mountain sheep redirects there but we don’t need the current history to do that.--76.65.40.44 (talk) 23:13, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete References fail the criteria for establishing notability, references are not intellectually independent and fail WP:ORGIND and/or WP:SIGCOV. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 20:18, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.