Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount Hannah Lodge, California

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor Talk 22:23, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Hannah Lodge, California[edit]

Mount Hannah Lodge, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lake County's "unincorporated community" list seems dominated by old resorts and the like, most of which we have been able to find little about. This is worse than most: I cannot find any reference to this that doesn't derive from GNIS or us. If it was a literal lodge, I can't find anything that says so, and if was, it's not there now; just a few scattered small houses. Mangoe (talk) 01:11, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Mangoe (talk) 03:33, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Mangoe (talk) 03:33, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Found one passing mention in relation to a wildfire and another in relation to some obscure plant species being found near the site decades ago. Given that newspapers.com has pretty good historical coverage of Lake County based on my searches for other Lake County locations, the fact that this site garnered 0 newspapers.com hits for me is impressive. No evidence that WP:GEOLAND is met and WP:GNG is not met. Hog Farm Talk 03:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mount Hannah as one of the Mayacamas Mountains could have an article written about it. There's plenty of geology. But I've come up empty on this subject too. It's not in the Arcadia Publishing book that we've been checking resorts against, for example. Uncle G (talk) 19:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.