Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mouhamed Abdulla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:36, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mouhamed Abdulla[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ACADEMICS, no WP:RS. WP:NOTRESUME. Judging by the numerous unsourced personal details, this is likely written by the subject himself as a promotional or vanity article. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:52, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:11, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This looks like an early-career researcher who doesn't yet meet WP:GNG or WP:PROF. Member but not a fellow of the IEEE and ACM. Hasn't held a named chair or been an editor-in-chief for a major journal. Hasn't led a notable organization. A GS search turns up lots of articles for similar names, but I don't see any that look like they came from his field. There is one photo caption in the entry that suggests he won a notable IEEE award, but it's actually the other person in the photo who won the award. EricEnfermero (Talk) 06:19, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this inflated article. Neither WP:Prof or WP:GNG passed. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:15, 12 August 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete non-notable academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:27, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:47, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable academic.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 23:23, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Citation record far too low for WP:PROF#C1 and none of the Wikipedia:Wikipuffery in the article (minor awards, hobnobbing with more famous people, etc) adds up to any other kind of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:00, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.