Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mouchette.org

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mouchette.org[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article about an artist and their website. Other than self-sourced material and creator-supplied bios, sources are a few (mostly dead) blogs and a couple of paragraphs in books. While there is evidence that this artist has exhibited, the coverage falls very far short of "has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition", or the other criteria described at WP:ARTIST. The site itself doesn't pass WP:WEB. I don't believe there's any credible evidence that the general standard of WP:GNG, that is "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - what we have is trivial coverage, unreliable sources, and the subject as the source. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 13:49, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 13:52, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 13:53, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article hasn't been substantially updated in several years, but there is more coverage in recent material - Girlhood and the Plastic Image by Heather Warren-Crow (Dartmouth College Press, 2014) in particular[1]. Also[2][3] and more testifying to the importance of the work as an innovative work of art. It has also been exhibited by one of the world's most prestigious modern art museums, the Stedelijk.[4] --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:51, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:28, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.