Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motokuni Nakagawa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:35, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Motokuni Nakagawa[edit]
- Motokuni Nakagawa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article fails to address WP:NACTOR (or WP:BIO for stuntman work) and there is a distinct lack of evidence on GBooks or GNews for evidence of impact on the historic notability. The article has been awaiting detail and improvement for over two years, so there seems little prospect of this changing in the near future. PROD quickly removed, so raising for wider discussion. Fæ (talk) 23:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 23:19, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 23:19, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 23:20, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:41, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This AFD was not originally transcluded into the log. I have now done so for February 24; consider that the Relisting date. On deletion, I have no opinion. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:40, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - there's no sources to verify his career; even the Japanese Wikipedia has nothing we would consider reliable. MSJapan (talk) 18:53, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.