Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MotoCMS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:13, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MotoCMS[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article in existence once again because a random account stated "It was only a deletion and the article is informative" yet this is of no comfort since the article itself is still trivial and unconvincing and the accompanying sources are also, and simply nothing establishes genuine substance and convincing for an article; the history as it is clearly shows there's been heavy emphasis from company-advertising accounts so it's not surprising they would jump at the article's deletion, so non-negotiable policy WP:NOT clearly applies. SwisterTwister talk 16:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:IINFO and WP:SPA - Majority of the article has been written by two users whose only edits are to this page. WP:PROMO may also apply. Although there are some criticisms stated, they are countered in a promotional way. Doesn't appear to be anything notable about the product. CBS527^Talk 15:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 15:24, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Very close to G7 territory, no independent indication of notability. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:33, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.