Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mother of all

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:16, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mother of all[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dicdef. I'm happy for someone to prove me wrong in this regard but for now, it just doesn't seem to have enough substance for an article. Coin945 (talk) 14:37, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – While examples of usage could be assembled, there really isn't anywhere encyclopedic this phrase can go. (And no, we don't want a "list of..." article either.)  Senator2029 ➔ “Talk”  18:48, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SYNTH. The article is merely a collection of quotes using the phrase in question, with no sources as to its origin or general use. Yoninah (talk) 22:18, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The page creator may have formatted this page after The new black, which is also a collection of tons of quotes without any solid sourcing on the expression itself. Yoninah (talk) 22:22, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. A wiktionary term, and already on wiktionary. Reh man 01:08, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.