Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Most Liberal Law School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 07:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Most Liberal Law School[edit]

Delete. Article specifically very POV. Wickethewok 04:32, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article seems POV by it's very nature. Fightindaman 04:33, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete There is little hope of this article ever being NPOV, but it is not based on a single article. -Harmil 04:35, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- You mean the articles cited are hoaxes? CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 05:15, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - inherently pov.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 05:13, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete What possible purpose could this list serve in an encyclopedia. Eivind 05:16, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. Royboy crashfan 05:44, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. -- Krash (Talk) 06:13, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete inherently POV. OhNo itsJamie ^Talk 06:59, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 09:53, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as POV article. --Ter e nc e Ong 11:03, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete pov. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-03-03 13:43Z
Weak delete. Something like Political tendencies of U.S. law schools might be appropriate. Though referenced, this is op-ed advocacy. Would like to find some way to keep the information, but it needs counterbalanced and put at an appropriate title. Smerdis of Tlön 16:41, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, POV pushing.--Isotope23 17:22, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as inherently biased and non-encyclopedic. dbtfz ^talk 19:20, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 19:27, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is no hope of this article ever being NPOV. Fan1967 20:32, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.