Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moss graffiti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Stifle (talk) 21:46, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moss graffiti[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, considered speedy but this is a new subject doesn't really look to be notable, refs go to an instruction website, and the first is to the epa. O.R. is a concern here for me too Hell In A Bucket (talk) 06:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - inadequate references.Deb (talk) 08:34, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Guerilla gardening. I found some refs[1][2][3][4][5], but it seems a bit of a fad and I don't think it's quite notable in itself. --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:46, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:24, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Σ σ ς. (Sigma) 07:30, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 14:07, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep appears to be just notable enough although maybe there isn't much that can be written about it using existing reliable sources. If Inhabitat is a reliable source then keep; if not, I wouldn't oppose merging to Guerilla gardening. Peter James (talk) 17:50, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - it's also mentioned in Forbes (in passing), so it appears to be gaining notability. Diego (talk) 22:59, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - it's the kind of topic that people would turn to wikipedia to learn more about because there aren't many other neutral 3rd party sources on it. The article would benefit from talking about the disadvantages of the graffiti, especially damage to buildings and other structures due to the growth of the moss. spacesoon (talk) 21:25, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Diego. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 10:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.