Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moshpit Tragedy Records (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:08, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moshpit Tragedy Records[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted by previous Afd Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Moshpit_Tragedy_Records I don't know why/how it got restored. I see it in Deletion Review, but there's nothing compelling there other than something about history and PageRank. Anyhow, it's still non-notable. It also fails enduring notability. Graywalls (talk) 02:00, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Organizations, Companies, and Canada. Graywalls (talk) 02:00, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:00, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per the nom, the article fails WP:GNG, however it also fails WP:SYNTH, only having one citation, and it's a passing mention of the record label. IncompA 08:19, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IncompA, please sign any comments you make in a deletion discussion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:53, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. I sometimes forget to sign my posts and usually when I miss them a bot fixes it but this didn't happen this time. IncompA 09:16, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:19, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; Graywalls makes a good argument on how the label fails enduring notability. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 00:55, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.