Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moshe Friedman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:08, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Moshe Friedman[edit]
- Moshe Friedman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Procedural nomination on behalf of a new user, Tellyuer1. The rational from the talk page: "Other than being a quack who attended a conference what makes this person worthy of a Wiki page. Should he not be lumped in with Neteuri Karta or others?Tellyuer1 (talk)" Personally have no opinion at this time. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:54, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a quack who has zero reason to be on wiki. Its a group of no importance and he is a member of a group - which should be perhaps lumped into others. Certainly not the page that now exists. Tellyuer1 (talk) 00:01, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Should be merged into this page - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neturei_Karta Tellyuer1 (talk) 00:21, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a quack who has zero reason to be on wiki. Its a group of no importance and he is a member of a group - which should be perhaps lumped into others. Certainly not the page that now exists. Tellyuer1 (talk) 00:01, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- speedy keep - the individual personal coverage of his 2006 speech alone would qualify, but now he has also been involved in a major lawsuit and gotten significant coverage of that as well. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 00:43, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- speedy keep Per the sources I am finding and RPoD Darkness Shines (talk) 00:53, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.