Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morten Pilegaard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:24, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Morten Pilegaard[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable producer. Fails WP:BIO. All references point to Lukas Graham, none for Morten Pilegaard. scope_creep (talk) 08:13, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:43, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:43, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:43, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:43, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:CREATIVE too, insofar as a producer is "creative" in any endeavor. None of the references give him any significant coverage at all. Epic fail of WP:GNG in spite of all the cited sources. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:28, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete Morten Pilegaard as it strictly is information about his released music and awards and nominations. This is a producer often mentioned in context with the world famous Artist/Band Lukas Graham. As producers are not the ones in the spotlight the amount of sources is limited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FrederikTWTTW (talk • contribs) 09:05, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.