Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morson Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. apparent consensus DGG ( talk ) 04:34, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Morson Group[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article seems promotional, fails to establish notability. RoCo^(talk) 16:42, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I disagree, Notability - If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject — Preceding unsigned comment added by Northern Pasty (talk • contribs) 16:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC) — Northern Pasty (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Keep Notability seems to have been established but the article is edited by WP:COI editors including User:Northern Pasty and User:Mor Mark and it needs a serious rewrite to remove the promotional soapbox phrases. i have started by removing the embedded links to the company web page Domdeparis (talk) 17:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have carried out some quite serious pruning to remove the promotional aspect and reduce it to a neutral tone and I have also removed the peacock terms about the CEO as well as the embedded links to over a dozen pages of the companies web site. Hopefully this should address the promotional aspect of the article now we have to decide if it meets WP:NORG Domdeparis (talk) 17:46, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help, I have made lots of edits to other unrelated articles but I don't usually sign in. I am still trying to learn how to edit wikipedia articles Northern Pasty — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.196.104.49 (talk) 09:05, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Northern Pasty: @135.196.104.49: No one is suggesting that yours is a Single purpose account, that said of the 138 total edits that you have made with both accounts at least 76 are on this subject (55%) and since you came back to editing in 2016 after 2 years away 76/88 (90%) of the edits are on Morson so it is a good thing to have made the disclosure I think. Domdeparis (talk) 12:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. unfortunately, there'snothing left to suppoort anarticle which would be more than a directory entry. DGG ( talk ) 04:54, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 18:06, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:15, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- an unremarkable recruiting firm going about its business. Content is still promotional, even after the pruning: awards, charities, office locations, etc. Content belongs on the company web site, not here. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:38, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It exists, but lacks substantial independent coverage from reliable sources, offered or to be found, to suggest that subject is notable. Continued presence on WP amounts to advertising, yet WP:NOTPROMO. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 18:46, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Reading all of your comments, I think I agree that this content is best on the Morson website, please go ahead and delete --Northern Pasty (talk) 08:18, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.